Read My Tweets
Ever feel like you're not getting the best experience on the web?
Get Silverlight to see the whole site!

Goals for 2009

Monday, January 05, 2009

Today Steve Smith, one of the Microsoft Regional Directors in the Heartland District, posted about his achievement of his goals for 2008, and how he was putting together his list for 2009.

It got me thinking about how I have actually never done this. I mean, I have goals, but I've never really thought about them on an annual basis. So, thanks to Steve, you get to see my list here. Here we go:

1. Lose 40 pounds.

I don't know how I can be more clear about this one. I don't consider myself fat, but I certainly have some weight to lose. I've steadily gained 4-5 pounds a year since I graduated high school, and enough's enough. I'm a solid 205 right now, and 165 would be a much healthier weight for me.

2. Spend more time with my kids.

As someone fortunate enough to work from home, I get to spend more time with my kids than most people, I think. I mean, I eat lunch with them nearly every day. But I don't feel like we "do" stuff together. I want that to change this year. It's gotta be less about the time, and more about the activity. I don't have a specific metric on this one, but writing it down will likely inspire me to follow through on it.

3. Post 100 times to my blog.

2008 was the busiest year for my blog, and I had 92 posts. I can do better, and it should only help me to achieve my next goal. This Friday, January 9th, will be my 3rd anniversary of blogging. It's taken me almost 3 years to really understand the platform, find my voice, and become relevant. Here's to executing on my newly found wisdom in 2009.

4. Get 1000 subscribers to my blog.

Some may think that I write posts to my blog because I want to share my knowledge and experiences with the world. My friends, it's all about the numbers. There's something inside me (my ego) that can't wait to see the statistics the day after a great blog post. Don't get me wrong, if the content's not good, the traffic won't be there. But I really like knowing that people CHOOSE to read what I write. That's a cool feeling.

5. Read 10 books.

I read everything. Newspapers, magazines, the internet, but never books. I don't know why, but I think it's because it takes too long. I have a huge set of books on my bookshelves in my office, and I'll bet I've read 7 of them. This includes technical books, novels, whatever. If I could just get myself off of my computer and into a chair with a book, I'd probably be more successful. I hope this one happens.

6. Change the world.

I have talked in small groups about how I want to do something significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia page. I'm not looking to be famous, and I certainly don't plan to get there by doing something illegal. I want to do something that others would agree, "That should be on Wikipedia."

7. Never buy another DVD.

I'm having a really hard time embracing this whole Blu-Ray thing when I have so many other options available to me that are physical-media-free. I can get many movies through my Netflix subscription streamed to my Xbox 360. I can watch them on demand though my cable. I can rip them to my hard drive and stream them around my house. Why buy something that is a disposable experience? I have a whole library of DVDs that we NEVER watch. But we keep buying them because we have this need to "own" it. Just like people need to "own" their DRM'd MP3s, I'm starting to think it doesn't make any sense.

What if, instead of having to buy each individual song/movie/book/etc., you could have the ability to enjoy ALL the songs/movies/books/etcs. for a monthly fee? I'm not going to get on my Zune Pass rant here, but I wouldn't think twice if there was a $20/month service that let me watch any movie any time I wanted. But it would have to be ANY movie. Not just the pittance that Netflix currently offers. And not just movies from one studio. I'd want all of them. Would you do that?

What are your goals for 2009? I am going to call out 10 people to write their own post, but don't feel because your name isn't on this list that you're not responsible for it as well. You read this post to the end. You're on the hook too.

Sarah Dutkiewicz

Michael Eaton

Keith Elder

Leon Gersing

Todd Kaufman

John Kellar

Joe O'Brien

John Stockton

Alan Stevens

Tim Wingfield

Labels: ,

posted by Jeff Blankenburg, 8:24 AM | link | 3 comments |

Happy Holidays From Jeff Blankenburg

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

On the eve of this holiday, I want to take an opportunity to thank all of you that I interact with on a daily basis. It is an absolute pleasure to be able to interact with all of you, and I look forward to seeing each of you in 2009 as well.

I truly believe that having the opportunity to surround myself with some of the smartest people in the midwest is making me a better programmer as well. For as much as I try to give to the development community, please know that secretly, I am taking your advice, suggestions, and prodding to heart.

Whether it's a comment on my blog, a solid Twitter conversation, or an email, I am connected to a solid network of hyper-intelligent individuals. And I'm thankful that I get to be a part of it.

Have a wonderful holiday season, take some time to recharge, and here's to an amazing 2009!
posted by Jeff Blankenburg, 10:33 AM | link | 0 comments |

3 Things The Auto Industry Could Learn From The Computer Industry

Monday, December 22, 2008

Clearly, the auto industry is struggling. As someone who has spent his career studying ways to improve things with technology and software, I have compiled a list of "recommendations" for the auto manufacturers to consider as they move forward.

1. Build cars like computers.

When you look inside a computer, none of the pieces were made by the same company. Each piece was made by a company that is good at that component. Maybe Western Digital makes the hard drive, Intel makes the chipset, RAM Co. makes the RAM (I don't know a well-known RAM company), etc.



You may be thinking to yourself, "but Jeff, Ford doesn't make the GPS they put in their cars either." Agreed. But could I easily (and for little cost and labor) replace it with a better model later? There, the answer's NO. Sure, I can buy a new car stereo for my car, but it's not something I can easily install, nor is it something that's going to just snap right in, like RAM or a hard drive.



Why not, instead, build cars with universal ports? Like a computer. Devices could plug in like USB devices do on a computer. 3rd party device manufacturers could build their wares to snap into place. Let's say your car comes with 3 ports. You can plug in a GPS device, a Zune, and a CD player. Don't care about a CD player? Use your third port as a DVD player. And best of all, you can buy these pieces at your favorite retailer: Best Buy, Circuit City, etc. Not direct (and only) from your dealer. Maybe that will be the end of problems like this one:


This is the GPS that is offered on the Ford Fusion I4 SEL today. DVD-based GPS devices were old 3 years ago. Self-contained, portable, hard-drive based, easily-updateable GPS devices are now the industry standard. New DVDs (you should get them updated each year) will cost you several hundred dollars as well. In addition, it's not portable. If I want to use it, I've got to be using THAT vehicle. All this for the bargain price of...did that say $1592? Holy crap. Maybe THAT's why they're not selling. Most GPS devices today cost less than $200. And they're better! It's disgraceful. It's as if they don't want to sell these things at all.

2. Get rid of the dealer system. Sell direct.

I mentioned this on Twitter today, and got a bunch of great responses, both positive and negative. The biggest point that was made was that there are laws in every state to prevent manufacturers from selling directly.
Over the past century, car dealers have secured a complex web of state laws that protect them from being undercut — by the car makers themselves, and more recently, by people trying to sell new cars online.
My question regarding these "franchise laws" is this: WHY? What happened to a "free market economy?" I'm sure there are thousands of examples where there are laws interfering with the true pricing of products (tariffs, etc.), but this is just ridiculous. Get rid of it. You want customers? Focus on customer service.



High-pressure, commissioned salesmen roaming the polished floor just waiting to be your best friend. Why do we do it this way? Because dealerships are not agents of the manufacturers, they have purchased a bunch of vehicles, and are now in a position where they have to sell them (at a good profit), or they're going to lose a BUNCH of money. So even though your hopes are high when you look at you next car online, when you get to the dealership, you're stuck picking from the rotten fruit that remains on their proverbial tree. "We don't have one with the GPS, but we do have this shiny silver one..." That's not service.

What if going to a dealership meant talking with someone who was paid to HELP you, not just pretend to be helpful until you decide to buy? What if they sat at a computer with you and helped you customize the exact car you wanted? And then drove it to your home or office to deliver it when it arrived!

One of the other comments people made was that my solution would still require a need for "dealerships." Yes and no. My dealerships just serve different purposes. My dealerships are based on customer service.
  1. Test drives - you can still test drive at the Jeep Store, but now you drive "the Grand Cherokee." Test driving a vehicle should not include driving the red one, or the one with the seat warmers. Drive the ONE Cherokee and determine if you like it. Then go home and order one from your computer.
  2. Repairs - there are some that still feel their car should be fixed by the company that made it. So they take it to the shop that they bought it from. What makes that place any more qualified than an independent one down the road? Training? Parts? Those are all things that could be solved other ways. I contend you don't need a branded dealer repair shop.
  3. Used cars/trade-ins - my last trade-in was done at CarMax. I took my car there, sold it to them, and they never once spoke to me about buying another vehicle from them. And I got the price I expected from the sale. Why do we need to mix new and used cars? Do you buy used Apple computers at apple.com? I think not.


3. Cater to what's cool. Not everyone's a motor head.

MP3 players have been on the market for almost 10 years. There are STILL cars being manufactured without a way to plug in these devices directly. We are talking about less than $10 worth of wire and a jack. Why is this being missed?



If a car manufacturer offered a base model (4 cylinder, 5-speed manual, 30ish MPG) that included some major features inside the car, I guarantee it would be one of the best selling cars of the year. Sure, there are different audiences for different cars. Some guys ONLY care about the size of the engine. But I contend that MOST could care less. Most people buy a car to get them to work. And if they could get a car that not only could tell them HOW to get to work efficiently, but also play their favorite songs, and entertain their kids on a long trip, that's the car they're going to buy. Adding GPS, a DVD player and screen, MP3 jack, Bluetooth, and an advanced CD/MP3 multi-disc player should not add more than $1000 to the base cost of the vehicle. I truly believe that you could make a fuel-efficient car with all of those features TODAY for less than $15K. But we won't see it. Not as long as billion dollar CEOs think it's acceptable to sell GPS for $1592.




How would YOU improve the next generation of vehicles to make them more appealing?

kick it on DotNetKicks.com

Labels: , , , , , , ,

posted by Jeff Blankenburg, 11:20 PM | link | 10 comments |